Who is ‘The English Bach?’ I’m Going with Bach’s Son

The results of an interesting study came out not long ago that finds people’s brains respond similarly to music no matter how different people are.


“We’ve shown for the first time that despite our individual differences in musical experiences and preferences . . . music elicits a highly consistent pattern of activity across individuals,” says Vinod Menon, the Stanford University professor who led the study.

Although that’s an interesting finding, what caught my eye was that the research was built around the music of the English Baroque composer William Boyce. The researchers decided on Boyce because his work fits well into the canon of Western music but is little known to modern Americans, said the article, by Bruce Goldman. Goldman also said that the “musical cognoscenti” call Boyce “‘the English Bach’ because his late-Baroque compositions in some respects resembled those of the famed German composer.”

That’s funny, because I always though the musical cognoscenti referred to Johann Christian Bach as “The English Bach.” Does that mean there are two “English Bachs?” That’s awkward.

Johann Christian Bach, also known as J.C. Bach, was the youngest son of Johann Sebastian Bach and wasn’t a Baroque composer; he was a Classical composer who was much admired by Mozart. He was called “The English Bach” because he spent considerable time in London, where he was called John Bach and also sometimes referred to as “The London Bach.”


You can get all that information on J.C. Bach’s entry on Wikipedia. Encyclopedia Britannica also calls him The English Bach.

By contrast, on William Boyce’s Wikipedia page, there’s no mention of his being called The English Bach. In fact, the only other place I could find him being called The English Bach is in a review of Trevor Pinnock’s William Boyce album, Eight Symphonies: The English Concert. In that review, a mystery person named “A Customer” says “I love the overtures (or symphonies) of William Boyce, the ‘English Bach,’ as I’m sure most lovers of late Baroque music do.”

Well, that sounds authoritative.

The idea that J.C. Bach is called The Englsh Bach is all over the Internet, not just on the Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica pages. So, I have to go with the idea that The English Bach is really J.C. Bach and William Boyce, as much as I like his music, is just an English composer.

Of course, all of this raises another question, which is whether Boyce should even be considered a Baroque composer. He’s sometimes referred to as a composer of the high or late Baroque period. But in some lists of Baroque composers, he’s left out entirely or else identified as an early Galante-era composer, which is the period of transition between the late Baroque and early Classical periods.

I donlt know enough about it to have an informed opinion on the matter, but I can say his music is nothing at all like, say, Corelli or Tartini or other composers who are firmly in Baroque territory. In some ways, Boyce’s music has a quality that seems more fitting in a Classical context than in a Baroque context. Of course, that’s what the Galante period was all about: moving from one period to another.

In any case, Boyce is a striking composer and it’s good to know that, whatever you think of his music, or even of J.C. Bach’s music, our brains respond to their work in the same way. Meanwhile, we’ll leave it to other parts of our brain to debate who The English Bach is.—Nabob, On Baroque

Back to Point Against Point
Back to home page

William Boyce: Notes and Commentary

William Boyce is widely regarded as one of the most important English-born composers of the 18th century. He is best known for his set of eight symphonies, his anthems, and his odes. He also wrote the masque Peleus and Thetis and songs for John Dryden’s Secular Masque, incidental music for William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Cymbeline, Romeo and Juliet and The Winter’s Tale, and a quantity of chamber music including a set of twelve trio sonatas. He also composed the British and Canadian Naval March “Heart of Oak”. The lyrics were later written by David Garrick for his 1759 play Harlequin’s Invasion.

Boyce was largely forgotten after his death and he remains a little-performed composer today, although a number of his pieces were rediscovered in the 1930s and Constant Lambert edited and sometimes conducted his works. Lambert had already launched the early stages of the modern Boyce revival in 1928, when he published the first modern edition of the Eight Symphonies (Bartlett and Bruce 2001). The great exception to this neglect was his church music, which was edited after his death by Philip Hayes and published in two large volumes, Fifteen Anthems by Dr Boyce in 1780 and A Collection of Anthems and a Short Service in 1790. He lived from September 1711 to February 7, 1779.—Excerpted from Wikipedia

Is Boyce sometimes referred to as “The English Bach?” That’s open to debate.

William Boyce Books and Music
More on William Boyce
Back to home page

William Boyce: Complete Works

The following list incomplete.
Castalio’s Complaint
The Chaplet

The Desponding Lover
The Distracted Lover


Fair Silvia

Heart of Oak

The Maiden Rose
The Modest Petition

O Praise the Lord
Overture No.2 ‘for Horns’
Overture No.3
Overture No.5
Overture No.9

The Shepherd’s Lottery
Symphony No.1 in B-flat major
Symphony No.2 in A major

12 Trio Sonatas

10 Voluntaries for the Organ
Voluntary in D major—Source: IMSLP.org

William Boyce Books and Music
More on William Boyce
Back to home page

William Boyce: Books and Music

Selected Books

Alleluia: A Round by William Boyce
Southern Music Co., 2001 (sheet music)
$12.95 on Amazon

boyce 7

Selected Music

boyce4 8 Symphonies: The English Concert (1990), 1 CD

boyce5 Complete Trio Sonatas (1999), 2-CD set

boyce6 Overtures: Concerti Grossi (2002), 2-CD set

More William Boyce music

More on William Boyce
Back to home page